From 64ec8aa157e5d5d09372def37cbab00628e1e5f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marvin Borner
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 22:20:58 +0200
Subject: Made exec syscall relative using app name

My plan is to implement a mobile-OS-like sandboxing using manifests
and permission middlewares. Let's see if I can manage to do this
without sacrificing too much performance.

I'm also wondering whether I should implement open/close syscalls
which would result in a cleaner block/unblock mechanism. I need to
think. Hmmm.. Naa
---
 apps/wm/Makefile | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'apps/wm/Makefile')

diff --git a/apps/wm/Makefile b/apps/wm/Makefile
index 66f68f6..48ed1d3 100644
--- a/apps/wm/Makefile
+++ b/apps/wm/Makefile
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
 OBJS = wm.o
 
 all: $(OBJS)
-	@$(LD) -o $(BUILD)/apps/wm $(LDFLAGS) $< -lgui -ltxt -lc
+	@mkdir -p $(BUILD)/apps/wm/
+	@$(LD) -o $(BUILD)/apps/wm/exec $(LDFLAGS) $< -lgui -ltxt -lc
 
 clean:
 	@$(RM) -f $(OBJS)
-- 
cgit v1.2.3