From 64ec8aa157e5d5d09372def37cbab00628e1e5f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marvin Borner
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 22:20:58 +0200
Subject: Made exec syscall relative using app name

My plan is to implement a mobile-OS-like sandboxing using manifests
and permission middlewares. Let's see if I can manage to do this
without sacrificing too much performance.

I'm also wondering whether I should implement open/close syscalls
which would result in a cleaner block/unblock mechanism. I need to
think. Hmmm.. Naa
---
 boot/load.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'boot')

diff --git a/boot/load.c b/boot/load.c
index a3566f4..12102a2 100644
--- a/boot/load.c
+++ b/boot/load.c
@@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ int main(void *first, void *second)
 	u8 drive = ata_probe();
 	assert(drive);
 
-	s32 elf = elf_load("/bin/kernel", drive);
+	s32 elf = elf_load("/apps/kernel/exec", drive);
 	assert(elf > 0);
 
 	void (*kernel)(void *, void *);
-- 
cgit v1.2.3