From 64ec8aa157e5d5d09372def37cbab00628e1e5f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marvin Borner
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 22:20:58 +0200
Subject: Made exec syscall relative using app name

My plan is to implement a mobile-OS-like sandboxing using manifests
and permission middlewares. Let's see if I can manage to do this
without sacrificing too much performance.

I'm also wondering whether I should implement open/close syscalls
which would result in a cleaner block/unblock mechanism. I need to
think. Hmmm.. Naa
---
 kernel/Makefile | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'kernel/Makefile')

diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
index 1c37168..e28d2d8 100644
--- a/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/Makefile
@@ -31,5 +31,5 @@ all: compile
 	@$(AS) $(ASFLAGS) $< -o $@
 
 compile: $(COBJS)
-	@mkdir -p $(BUILD)/apps/
-	@$(LD) -N -z max-page-size=0x1000 -ekernel_main -Tlink.ld -o $(BUILD)/apps/kernel -L$(BUILD) $+ -lk
+	@mkdir -p $(BUILD)/apps/kernel/
+	@$(LD) -N -z max-page-size=0x1000 -ekernel_main -Tlink.ld -o $(BUILD)/apps/kernel/exec -L$(BUILD) $+ -lk
-- 
cgit v1.2.3