From 64ec8aa157e5d5d09372def37cbab00628e1e5f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marvin Borner
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 22:20:58 +0200
Subject: Made exec syscall relative using app name

My plan is to implement a mobile-OS-like sandboxing using manifests
and permission middlewares. Let's see if I can manage to do this
without sacrificing too much performance.

I'm also wondering whether I should implement open/close syscalls
which would result in a cleaner block/unblock mechanism. I need to
think. Hmmm.. Naa
---
 kernel/features/proc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'kernel/features/proc.c')

diff --git a/kernel/features/proc.c b/kernel/features/proc.c
index f547193..479427c 100644
--- a/kernel/features/proc.c
+++ b/kernel/features/proc.c
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ NORETURN void proc_init(void)
 	// Idle proc
 	// TODO: Reimplement hlt privileges in idle proc (SMEP!)
 	struct proc *kernel_proc = proc_make(PROC_PRIV_NONE);
-	assert(elf_load("/bin/idle", kernel_proc) == EOK);
+	assert(elf_load("idle", kernel_proc) == EOK);
 	proc_stack_push(kernel_proc, 0);
 	proc_stack_push(kernel_proc, 0);
 	kernel_proc->state = PROC_BLOCKED;
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ NORETURN void proc_init(void)
 
 	// Init proc (root)
 	struct proc *init = proc_make(PROC_PRIV_ROOT);
-	assert(elf_load("/bin/init", init) == EOK);
+	assert(elf_load("init", init) == EOK);
 	proc_stack_push(init, 0);
 	proc_stack_push(init, 0);
 	current = list_first_data(proc_list_running, init);
-- 
cgit v1.2.3